(no subject)
Nov. 7th, 2003 09:27 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
eggwardsWhat's worse? To have no standards at all, or to have high standards and always seem to be failing?
eggwardseggwards
Profile
eggwards
Page Summary
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 10:06 pm (UTC)If you have high standards, you always have a goal to focus on. Failure is normal. Failure shows us our shortcomings, so that we can repair them. Even when you fall down, you can look back up and see them there, ready to be achieved. When you have high standards (like my doctoral plans, for example), your goal is always there--even if you may not be able to get there easily..
If you have no standards, you're aimless and wandering...